New Jr. High part of CPS plan

By Jim Osborn josborn@columbustelegram.com
Tuesday, Feb 10, 2009 - 11:42:01 am CST

COLUMBUS -- Planning for dealing with a current enrollment bulge at Columbus Public Schools could begin as early as this fall with the purchase of a 40- to 50-acre tract of land for a new school for seventh- and eighth-graders.

That was the consensus of the CPS Board of Education Monday evening with the unveiling of a four-year timeline charting the district’s response to swelling elementary enrollment that began this year.

The timeline presented by CPS Superintendent Paul Hillyer during Monday’s board meeting begins this fall with the land purchase and ends in the summer of 2013 with the completion of a new school for seventh- and eighth-graders.

In between, the district would hire an architect (January 2010) and seek approval from the voters on a bond issue in the fall of next year. The plan of action allows for a second bond vote if the first one fails, with a two-year construction schedule beginning in the spring or summer of 2011.

Without the building of a new school for seventh- and eighth-graders, enrollment at the existing middle school (grades six, seven and eight) is expected to climb sharply, from 840 in 2012-13 to nearly 1,000 in 2015-16.

Enrollment would reach a “critical stage” about 2014-15 with enrollment more than 900 if nothing is done, Hillyer told the board.

Last fall, the school board established the district’s course by backing building a new school for seventh- and eighth-graders and remodeling the existing middle school to extend the more than 80-year-old facility’s life span for another decade, while also expanding elementary schools.

The plan calls for building the new school, while using the old middle school for fifth- and sixth-graders with a long-term plan for moving them to the new school site in a separate facility to create a campus-like atmosphere.

Board members have suggested using the existing middle school, which is scheduled for a renovation this summer to include the installation of a sprinkler system and other health and safety improvements mandated by the state fire marshal, as a stopgap facility for up to a decade.

Work on a $1.8 million addition to Lost Creek Elementary School that will add six classrooms should begin when the final bell sounds this spring. The expansion is expected to open about January 2010.

Kindergarten expansion projects at North Park, Centennial and Emerson schools were completed last summer. Kindergarten enrollment totaled nearly 320 students this fall and is expected to swell to about 350 next year.

The last bond issue OK’d by CPS voters was the 2002 passage of a $17.5 million renovation of the high school.

In other business, the school district and the city doubled up on projects for new tennis courts at Pawnee Park and infrastructure improvements for an area that will be the site of a new armory and a future school.

The board agreed to share equally in a $360,000 project to build six new public tennis courts and pay one-third of an estimated $400,000 ($133,333) in infrastructure improvements along East 14th Avenue north of 23rd Street.

Grant applications are being prepared to agencies such as the Nebraska Game and Parks Commission and the U.S. Tennis Association to help offset the cost of the project.

The school district and city would also share equally in any grant funds awarded.

The city, which will handle the bidding process, has not yet established a construction timetable for the project.

The city is planning to build a new National Guard and U.S. Army Reserve Readiness Center and a park on a 32-acre tract along the east side of East 14th Avenue.

The school bought an adjacent 20-acre parcel as the site for a future elementary school.

The city expects to begin work on the water, paving and sanitary and storm sewer improvements this construction season.

Street paving, with an estimated price tag of $265,000, makes up the bulk of the project cost.

Leave a Comment

All posts are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
   
Southside
Feb 10, 2009 12:27 PM
Build a new high School and use the existing high school as a middle school.
Just a thought.
Whynot
Feb 10, 2009 12:46 PM
Why not use the old Wal Mart Building? It is certainly big enough, just add a gymnasium and I'm sure Wal Mart would make it a good deal.
octofoil
Feb 10, 2009 12:47 PM
I'll second Southside's idea. I have often wondered why they didn't do that long ago. But, there are pet projects and CPS enjoys spending money like it grows on a tree. I suspect the long-term plans are final, and this is all just a formality.

What ever happened to the results of the survey CPS took a year or two ago regarding a new middle school?
MisterKnowItAll
Feb 10, 2009 3:36 PM
CPS - Long Planning has not done a real good job of planning ahead. You build a new elementary school and within several years have to add on. It would have been much more cost efficient to have added the rooms the first time around.

You would think that the Board of Education and Superintendent would have done a better job of planning.

Moving the middle school students to the high school and looking at a new high school makes sense, but the cost would be unbelievable.

Lets plan ahead 10-15 years this time and not just 2 or 3 years.
Its just so simple
Feb 10, 2009 3:43 PM
They should have built a new high school, moved the kids into that. Redo the high school and make that the middle school. It would have eased a lot of problems. Anyone who worked in that building during contruction knows that on many days, very little learning took place. It's pretty hard to concentrate when there is a jackhammer outside your door.

Too late, I know. Let's hope they just build a new building and don't put more kids through that awful chaos.
Not Now
Feb 10, 2009 5:09 PM
I don't believe we are done with the tax from the high school bond issue yet. With the economy right now, I don't believe this is a good idea.
southsidealso
Feb 10, 2009 5:58 PM
Putting 5th graders in a situation like this? They are not ready. I didn't think 6th graders were ready for that either when they made that decision. Our kids grow up way to fast as it is and now you are talking about mixing them in with 7 & 8th graders?
Rye Catcher
Feb 10, 2009 6:08 PM
If you people have all of these strong opinions on this, why are 95% of the CPS school board meeting attended by 0 (yep, ZERO) patrons????
okay
Feb 10, 2009 6:09 PM
Well it really makes no sense that they would move the Middle School students into the high school. The high school was renovated and designed specifically for the High school's needs. It would be nice if the old building was renovated to last for more like 30 years and build a campus off of that. It would be sad to see that area abandoned or sold off like Field and Highland Park, and then find out we needed that area.
okay
Feb 10, 2009 6:11 PM
I totally agree w/ MrKnowitAll. It really makes no sense that they would move the Middle School students into the high school. The high school was renovated and designed specifically for the High school's needs. It would be nice if the old building was renovated to last for more like 30 years and build a campus off of that. It would be sad to see that area abandoned or sold off like Field and Highland Park, and then find out we needed that area.
Realist
Feb 10, 2009 6:55 PM
Good Call RyeCather! I know that I make some outspoken posts on here but at least I attend the meeting that I comment about. Most of these posts are from people who want to complain and not advance, but blame the school when their children and/or loved ones get short changed or not a good enough education. Matter of fact, they also believe that teachers are overpaid and that they should alos provide a "FREE" babysitting clinic as well. Finally, they also want physical education out of schools because their precious children are uncomfortable in participating because they are overweight and insecure. Wonder who introduced and instilled that into their life! It is easy, buy a computer and a sony playstation and that will be the entertainment/babysitter. Saves money!
Hey Southsidealso
Feb 10, 2009 7:03 PM
How do you know that 5th graders aren't ready to be in middle school? Should 9th graders be with seniors? I think it is something to be looked into. Other states outside of Nebraska have 5th grade in the middle school. The town that I live in has 5th grade in the middle school, and it works just fine. I know that it probably isn't appropriate in every school, but at least look into it, don't just say it won't work or that it is bad.

Also, the need for more classrooms is something that should have been thought of long before the new schools were built. That is a result of poor planning. There should have been a new high school built and the middle school should have been moved to the high school before the high school remodeling started. That way we wouldn't have to spend all that money to add sprinklers and other required upgrades that also should have been done a long time ago, just to leave the building in ten years for a new one.
Tapped out
Feb 11, 2009 12:07 AM
No more O.T. at work maybe even a layoff coming.Taxes toooooo high already, paying on a 17.5 million bond and all the school board wants to do is spend more. The board members maybe rich but my family still needs to eat. This spend spend attitude must stop! Lets pay off one before you stick us with another. Make do with what we have just like the rest of us have to in this economy. Don't spend money the people don't have, this is why the economy is so bad people spending and borrowing money they can't pay back.
wow Columbus at it again
Feb 11, 2009 6:07 AM
local factories laying off every week...
people will be living on unemployment for a year....then what???
ok..let's raise their property taxes even higher
foreclosure rate will go up--property taxes won't be paid-then what??

the leaders of the community really need to listen to Mr. Peter Schiff for a session
the greater depression is around the corner
Can you read
Feb 11, 2009 6:35 AM
For those of you questioning placing 5 graders with the older kids, did you actually read the article? 5 and 6 would be at the old middle school with the eventual plan of moving them to the new school IN A SEPERATE FACILITY. Here's the quote "The plan calls for building the new school, while using the old middle school for fifth- and sixth-graders with a long-term plan for moving them to the new school site in a separate facility to create a campus-like atmosphere."
WILL VOTE NO
Feb 11, 2009 8:30 AM
Just did a re-look at 2008 real estate tax statement. 65% of the total tax is going to Columbus public schools. WOW !
I will vote NO until the existing bonds are paid off. Having an open checkbook is a luxury given to the School Board but not to ordinary tax payers.
The School Board is ALREADY allowing for a second vote on a bond issue in case the first one fails. What does that tell you ??
VOTE NO...VOTE NO...VOTE NO
rob g
Feb 11, 2009 8:39 AM
Everything in this plan points further to Hilliers goal of 'economies of scale". 5th and 6th graders, and I would even argue 7th and 8th graders, are not ready for a high school campus or college style setting. Smaller classes with the same teacher for most of the day is the best thing for younger kids. Dr. Hillier would make a great cattle yard operator the he wants to herd kids through, but his liberal agenda is a poor plan for educating them. School vouchers is the obvious solution to overcrowding. Give every parent the right to spend their money where they choose and that would lead directly to more schools, smaller classes, and a better education!
vote no
Feb 11, 2009 9:51 AM
vote no untill politicians start doing something about illegal immigration, which is the real reason they want this!
vote no
Feb 11, 2009 9:56 AM
I also think they could use the $360,000 they are planning for Tennis courts instead of borrowing more money!
john
Feb 11, 2009 10:09 AM
i just have a couple questions.
1. why are they planning an elementary school north of the hwy on east 14th ave?
2. why do we have to buy more land for this jr. high campus when the district already owns land out by the hospital?
3. is the emerson and centinial bond paid off?
Day late dollar short
Feb 11, 2009 10:31 AM
Maybe they could hold classes under the new viaduct instead of building a new middle school...

Get it Columbus voters, you are always a day late and a dollar short?!?

How are you going to feel when the class sizes are 30-35 and your children and grandchildren are not able to ask a question because the teacher only had time to answer the other 20 kids in line ahead of yours???

Do not let the children pay because you don't want to!
enough
Feb 11, 2009 11:25 AM
Is'nt it funny how the Cathlic schools spend much much less per child yet give them a much better education on average. I realize that Cathlic school kids usually have more involved parents but that is only a small part of it!
Irony
Feb 11, 2009 2:20 PM
Isn't it funny how someone claiming Catholic schools provide a much better education can't spell "isn't" or "Catholic" correctly???
enough
Feb 11, 2009 3:32 PM
It was probably just a typo or maybe it was my public education in a school of about 1000 kids
OCmon
Feb 11, 2009 3:39 PM
"I realize that Cathlic school kids usually have more involved parents but that is only a small part of it!"

ARE YOU KIDDING ME?? That is the most ignorant statement I have heard in a long time. You must be living a very sad life to believe thats true.
bob
Feb 11, 2009 3:48 PM
Better watch out the spelling police are out. When you can't argue with the message I guess the next best thing is to attack the messenger. I guess anyone who grew up poor and had to get a job at 14 years old does not have an opinion of any value!
Yeah for Public Education
Feb 11, 2009 4:55 PM
I would like to know how many special needs kids are educated in those catholic schools? Do you offer Title and Special Education for those children? If there were no public schools - where would those children go?Best taught lesson in Catholic schools - arrogance!
Ron Sargent
Feb 11, 2009 6:57 PM
I would vote yes for this in a heartbeat if they find a differnt way to fund it. Raising taxes is never a good solution for any problem. Find another way by cutting spending.
I have a child in all three levels of school right now and by far the middle school is the most crowded not to mention it is a joke how the traffic works around that building. A new middle school is a must have in columbus but it can be done in a way that can be tax payer friendly.
NORTHSIDE FARMER
Feb 12, 2009 6:28 AM
TO IRONY: DON'T WORRY ABOUT HOW WE CATHOLICS SPELL. ALSO, DON'T FORGET THE AREA LUTHERAN AND CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS THAT ARE ALSO DOING A GREAT JOB IN EDUCATING THEIR CHILDREN. MAYBE THE ANSWER TO THE EDUCATION PROBLEM IS TO HAVE MORE FAITH BASED SCHOOLS. THE COLUMBUS SCHOOL'S ANSWER FOR EVERYTHING IS TO SPEND MORE AND GET LESS RESULTS.
rob g
Feb 12, 2009 7:47 AM
It has been a long time since I have been in school but I do not think the cost of educating a special needs kid is that much more. Unless things have changed, usually parents that keep their special needs kids in public school want them as much as possible in the general classes. As far as physical accomadations, the parochial schools have to meet all the same ADA requirements. The results and cost comparison of a religious school and public school is so far apart that you have to look at other reasons than just a few special needs kids. The main difference is that public schools mostly have an OPEN checkbook and private schools have to MAKE DUE with what is AVAILABLE!
Ken
Feb 12, 2009 11:44 AM
Maybe rob g and northside farmer need to spend some time in a public school and take a good look at the program, students, and the services offered. They may then go and compare to other educational institutions. Oh, and lets not forget NCLB, Nebraska Rule 51, and other things that society has demanded of the public schools.
tiny tim
Feb 12, 2009 1:51 PM
rob g:

Have you ever heard of an I.E.P.? It stands for individualized education plan. Every special needs student needs to have one developed and each plan has various needs for that student. It may be special equipment, extra supervision/help, and other accomadations that parochial schools do not necessarily have to provide. It goes above and beyond what ADA requires. Educating special needs students is very costly for schools in terms time, effort, and monetary value...
irony lover
Feb 12, 2009 4:36 PM
well....it looks like those against public education are at least smart enough to argue on the internet!!!

Good job guys!!! Way to think of the future...

And the spelling is a big deal. Why should I take anything that poster says about education seriously when they proved to me in the few sentences they wrote that they were not well educated themselves??
NORTHSIDE FARMER
Feb 12, 2009 4:39 PM
I TALK IN ALL CAPS BECAUSE IT MAKES PEOPLE THINK I AM IMPORTANT ON THE INTERNET!!
octofoil
Feb 12, 2009 6:43 PM
I am not necessarily opposed to ideas to support growth. But why do they present it in piecemeal? Is there a long-term plan? If so, what is it? I voted no for the $17M high school renovation because I think it would have been better spent toward a new high school. Everyone talks about growth, but how much available capacity is left at the high school? Now that we have invested, what are they going to do with it once they say it is too small? What about the million dollar renovation to the stadium, then $360,000 for tennis courts. I am not trying to bash CHS Admin & Board, I just don't want to spend money foolishly. Maybe there is no long-term plan. If there is, let's hear it.
Realist
Feb 13, 2009 8:00 AM
It is truely funny how the pro catholic people who post on here know how to dodge the question when special education is involved. Oh yeah, that is when the public school system is good enough for them because then they can send their special needs child to us public schools. Just goes to show you what they think of us and I am sure that those private school parents also feel that they have the right to send their child to public schools because it is their right and they get to pick and choose as they please. Bet anything, that is how they think. It is kinda like the old saying that is like this: Anything of mine is mine and anthing of yours is mine as well!
Realist
Feb 13, 2009 8:06 AM
By the way Rob G- The open checkbook comment, I would think that you would be smarter than that to post this comment. It is a choice of the parent to send their children to to a private school and it is also comes with a cost. But, you don't see that because you seem to be blinded with the idea that going to a private school is the only way to go and as stated earlier, we as public educators HAVE to accomodate what you can't accomodate without thinking about it. That is the mentality that private schools seem to have. Provide documentation or facts that hold your statement true and better yet, show me a special education program that your private school has. Just because you have a program does not necessarily mean that you have one in place. It looks good on paper and may be there, but it does not have to be used at all. I am disappointed in your comment Rob G!
rob g
Feb 13, 2009 8:27 AM
Thanks for a curtious response tiny tim. I do not know all of the specifics on the exact cost of educating special needs kids, but one thing I know for sure is that private schools do a much better job of stretching each dollar for each student. It only takes good Nebraska common sense to know that, not a PHD title. Teaching a kid is not about money, it is about qaulity people educating them. A great teacher can get great results under an apple tree. School vouchers would lead to greater competition among schools forcing all of them to improve. School vouchers do not need to be only about religious schools. For example, there might be a great history teacher in Schuyler that I want to be my childs teacher. With a voucher each individual would have the control over how their education money is spent. With school vouchers CPS would not need a new school because there would be a mass exidous of students to better schools. I sure hope I spelled everything correctly, my puplic education lets me down sometimes. Maybe next time we should just have a spelling bee for President, it can't be any worse than voting for a President based on the color of his skin!
rob g
Feb 13, 2009 8:41 AM
Realist, obviously the Open checkbook comment is hyperbole but 17.5 million sounds like an open checkbook to most schools. And once more, school vouchers do not need to be only about parochial schools. They are about CHOICE for each parent.
Involved
Feb 13, 2009 10:02 AM
Regarding the HS and 17 million. To build new and build just what is at CHS would be between 32 and 40 million. One would not build something less than what is there today. Also, this facility is built for older students and would not necessarily make for a good MS. Look at what Fremont and Norfolk did. They both build new facilities for their middle school and junior high. So if you are worried about taxes today think if you were paying a 32 million dollar bond instead of a 17 million dollar bond. Next the renovated HS has the capacity of 1500 students with approximately 1150 students today. So it will be a viable building thoughtout the payment time and beyond. Finally on this subject, if one built a new high school you would still have had to spend at least 10 million to upgrade the heating, windows, doors, and other basic facilities just to make the HS usable for the middle school because like the existing middle school it had sprinkler, fire doors, fire alarm and other life safety issues that had to be addressed in addition to a inefficient heating, cooling and electrical systems. The building was nearly 50 years old when renovated. It had been well taken care of but was worn out.

Regarding the renovation of the stadium, that was totally a city project paid for with sales tax dollars. No school tax dollars where provided to this project. That means the stadium is being paid for with money from people inside and outside Columbus and beyond. Regarding the tennis facility, this is something both the city and the school district needs. Remember tennis at CHS is a coop sport so both students from CHS and Scotus will use the facility for competition. Also, even though they talk about tournaments, it is primarily about quality of life for city residents young and old. My biggest disappoint about the funding is the tennis organization's lack of guaranteed dollars. All other groups in Columbus have build their facilities by raising a major portion of the money, i.e. soccer, baseball, skateboarders, softball both men and women, etc. The tennis organization demands better faclities and provide no guaranteed money (like 1/3rd). This would also be an opportunity for business, especially in the industrial tracks that pay no city taxes, to step up and sponsor a court or two for their employees they bring to town.

Finally, with the 7 and 8th grade attendance center would someone please inform the Telegram we have not had a Jr. High since 1986. So why the uniformed headline?

Finally, I will address other issues mentioned in the previously blogs when I get frustrated enough.
Realist
Feb 13, 2009 11:12 AM
So it can be your choice so don't try to stick up for the private schools. Public schools have as great if not better teachers in the system as well as MAGNIFICENT Spedteachers. Private schools want the best of both worlds and expect that we a taxpayers and promoters of public schoools to throw our jacket over a puddle of mud/water for private school endorsers. Also, private school parents are ready to point out the downfalls of public school families/students and not take a look in the mirror. Great example is look at Glurs Tavern. Can bet that many who frequent there are from the private sector and gossip how terrible public school students/parents are when they ar right there drinking away not knowing that they are just as bad if not worse!
Print This Story Email This Story

Hot Topics

Calendar of Events

Photos