County wants crossing closed

By Adrian Sanchez asanchez@columbustelegram.com
Sunday, Nov 30, 2008 - 12:03:26 am CST

COLUMBUS -- Another request by the Platte County Board of Supervisors to close the East 14th Avenue railroad crossing will be presented to the City Council during its meeting Monday.

The request to close the East 14th Avenue crossing, which is inside city limits, was initially discussed by the council April 21 and a motion to decline the request passed 6-2. A few councilmen’s objections to the closure included a lack of benefit to the city, concerns from constituents and too many unknowns regarding the area, including speculation about proposed development.

The council is expected to enter into a closed session regarding the agenda item during its meeting, which is scheduled for 7 p.m. Monday at the Council Chambers, 1369 25th Ave.

The board of supervisors hopes additional information may persuade the council to change its position and permit the East 14th Avenue crossing to be closed as part of the proposed East 29th Avenue viaduct construction project.

Because the Nebraska Department of Roads and the Union Pacific Railroad Co. require that at least two crossings ” the crossing for the structure and an adjacent crossing ” be closed, East 14th Avenue and East 44th Avenue are the options for the adjacent crossing closure.

According to the data collected, the average daily traffic volume across the 14th Avenue crossing is lower than the East 44th Avenue crossing traffic volume and “no significant issues are anticipated with closure of either the East 14th Avenue or East 44th Avenue (Union Pacific Railroad) at-grade crossings.”

In addition to support from the county supervisors, the Columbus Economic Council and Columbus Area Chamber of Commerce are supportive of closing East 14th Avenue as part of the construction of an East 29th Avenue viaduct.

City Administrator Joseph Mangiamelli said the staff’s recommendation is to close the East 14th Avenue upon completion and opening of an East 29th Avenue viaduct.

“That has been our staff recommendation since the county first made its request,” Mangiamelli said, with safety being cited as the primary reason for the recommendation as the potential for vehicle-train exposure is expected to increase.

The railroad uses the area of East 14th Avenue for short-term train holding, which results in the crossing being closed consistently to vehicular traffic, he said, which is expected to be exacerbated as the Union Pacific is anticipated to make improvements and expand.

“With the anticipation of the third mainline coming to Columbus and an increasing number of trains, this condition will only worsen so closure may result on a daily basis,” Mangiamelli said. “This problem will be compounded by the spur line to be built to serve ADM, Katana and other industrial sites in the area, creating a fourth track upon which trains can be in movement or be parked, causing closure.”

“With the anticipation that increased and longer trains will be coming through the city, obviously we want to do whatever we can to increase that safety,” he said.

In other news the council is expected to:

• vote on a resolution to award low bid to General Excavating of Lincoln in the amount of $684,965 for Water Extension District No. 59, 33rd Avenue and 66th Street and Central Community College-Columbus.

• vote on a resolution to award low bid to General Excavating of Lincoln in the amount of $213,190 for Behlen Lift Station Renovation Project, north of 23rd Street/U.S. Highway 30 and east of the Loup Power District canal.

• vote on a resolution to approve an agreement between the City of Columbus and HDR Engineering Inc. for professional services for Solid Waste Transfer Station and Recycle Center Study, not to exceed $48,557 without the city’s written consent.

• vote on a resolution to award low bid to Obrist & Co. in the amount of $47,575 for 24-inch Water Main Project at Lost Creek Parkway and 33rd Avenue.

• vote on, as part of the consent agenda, a resolution to approve an agreement between the City of Columbus and Gilmore & Associates Inc. to provide airport management services.

• vote on, as part of the consent agenda, the approval of specifications and purchase of one sedan and two utility vehicles for the Police Department from the current State Bid Contract in the amount of $66,433.

Leave a Comment

All posts are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
   
mickey j
Nov 30, 2008 7:23 AM
I say the city waits until Arnie Stuthman receives some funds and starts building a new Platte River bridge that would connect with Bellwood and this viaduct. That way the viaduct actually would have an economic impact by bringing in more people from the David City area. It's too bad our city council didn't have a little foresight to see this potential and have the north "bypass" meet up at E. 29th Avenue making it more of a natural bypass.

I like the overall potential, but I hate our council's thinking on projects like these...
rob g
Nov 30, 2008 10:29 AM
I did not realize Gilmore and Associates was in the airport managemnet buisiness! Does anyone know of any connections between Gilmore co., and anyone on the airport board? I believe I have my suspicions but I will not name any names without proof!
Chicago Mike
Nov 30, 2008 12:11 PM
mickey j, this is exactly what I've said in numerous posts here. The northern bypass, new viaduct and a Platte river bridge should all line up in a seamless bypass. I fear it is now too late, as the bypass, Lost Creek Parkway I believe it's called, pretty much dead ends at Walmart and Hwy 30.
Jake r
Nov 30, 2008 12:11 PM
The Platte Co. Supervisors should improve east 8th street. The black top road is in disrepair and needs to be widened and paved with concrete since asphalt does not stand up to the heavy traffic
mikey
Nov 30, 2008 12:55 PM
East 44th Avenue may have higher traffic now, but what about projected traffic counts? The city is rapidly growing east, and it's only a matter of time before retail businesses surround East 14th Avenue. Doesn't it seem likely that city residents will opt to cross the tracks at East 14th Avenue and avoid the traffic at 3rd Avenue, East 6th Avenue, and the entrance to Village Centre???
Fact Check
Nov 30, 2008 2:20 PM
The location of Lost Creek Parkway was the result of federal regulations. The feds would not allow another bridge over the canal because it was declared a national historic site. The council tried to put it further east.
mickey j
Nov 30, 2008 6:05 PM
To Fact Check:

East 29th Ave is on the west side of the canal. The bypass could have followed the canal without having to build another canal. Please check your facts...
unbelievable
Nov 30, 2008 9:47 PM
Let's all visit Duncan and see how they managed to put together a planning commission.

This should have all been on the books years ago. But, as usual, we like to resort to the John Wayne School of Municipal Planning. The UP, the State, the county, the city, the school, other misc municipalities, and local industry, are not in sync. It is really quite sad for a community of this size. Why plan when we can just foolishly react to everything?

I absolutely agree with mickey j & Chicago Mike on this one. A plan is such a terrible thing to waste.

Also, when I learned the arterial would exit next to wal-mart on east 6th ave, it made me wonder why they didn't just put up a viaduct on east 6th ave. The city already owns the land between christophers cove and the new bd plant. If you look hard enough, you will find that the "city" acquired this land in a very unique situation that most would prefer be kept quiet.

They could have traded some land with BD and made a road that connected East 14th to East 6th so closing that crossing wouldn't be an issue reagrdless where the viaduct ends up. Well, at least we have a plan to buy really cool wallpaper every 10 years!!!
Free U.P. parking...
Dec 1, 2008 4:41 AM
It is pretty hard to get a 'traffic
count' when the East 14th crossing is
always used as a parking stall for
U.P.
It appears that the Columbus City
Council didn't squeal loud enough for
the enjoyment of the railroad. Now, they
want the Board of Supervisors to dance
for them.
North Platte
Dec 1, 2008 6:38 AM
Has any one visited North Platte, Ne. and noted how the railroad has a really big complex built there. It is a sight to see.
Does North Platte have a happy relationship with the rail road?? Again I will say the Rail road has a lot to do with Columbus becoming a succesful community. But with the progress comes a price tag. What would Columbus be if the rail road pulled out the tracks and by passed Columbus ! How many jobs would leave, how many factorys would move out of Columbus.
COMMON SENSE SAYS
Dec 1, 2008 12:19 PM
Don't close any crossings until after the viaduct is built. See how traffic goes at least a year after it is completed to include all seasons and then make some decisions.

Why is it to be decided behind closed doors? I do believe the public has a right to know what is going on in their tax paid city transactions.
unbelievable
Dec 1, 2008 1:12 PM
I don't think anyone has any qualms with the concept of the railroad, just the way things seems to work regarding the railroad. The cliche being "railroaded" wasn't an accident.

Also, if you look a little closer at North Platte, you can also tell how much futher the swith yard is out of town compared to Columbus. Especially if you use the western most viaduct of the 4 they have in town. The mess we have is that we are land locked by the rivers, the railroad, the canal, and our special airport. West is wide open, but we are developing to the East (good plan).

You may also find this amusing, that someone did ask the UP years ago about moving the tracks out of town. I believe their answer was that it would be cheaper to move Columbus.
WHY
Dec 2, 2008 4:04 AM
Why does the County board want to close the crossing that eventually be an asset to Columbus? They need to close East 44th Ave. All this viaduct does is benefit ADM and the UPPR. Not, "Columbus" or its citizens. Is Wal-Mart worried that some competion might be already looking at this land to buy. And if there is no road open why would they even buy it. Too close to Wal-Mart. That is why the Chamber is for it. They will bend forward or backwards for Wal-Mart and the R.R. I would support this viaduct if they close E. 44th Ave. But closing E.14th Ave is a really Stupid idea. And all it does for Columbus is that we would have a nice railyard. Grand Island told the UP where they can drive there trains!!! Right up there Cabboose!!
Question
Dec 2, 2008 1:25 PM
TO UNBELIEVABLE

Under what circumstances did the City acquire the land in between C.C. and BD ?
If I remember correctly the City had to take it over when the "fat cats" who owned C.C. walked away from their tax obligations sticking it to the rest of us. By the way most of the "fat cats" had the enough $ of their own to pay the assessments but chose to hide behind the corporation. Years later some of the identical "fat cats" bought the lots back for dimes on the dollar. These people were considered by most to be upstanding citizens of this community...not in my books..
So tell me who wants to keep what quiet.....
unbelievable
Dec 2, 2008 6:13 PM
To question;

It wasn't me who wanted to keep it quiet, just didn't think it was relavent to the topic. If I understand correctly, I believe that a paving district was created for the development of cristophers cove and the "corporation" just happen to be out of money after the "city" paid for it. So the tax payers paid the bill for the streets and the city "acquired" the worthless adjacent land as payment. I think it would have been worse, but I believe a councilman told them he thought the boat ramp was public property and then the "corporation" decided to make a peace offering to keep us common folk out of their lake. I think "swindle" would be a good word to describe it. I am not sure about the status now, but I think the city was trying to sell that land to a residential developer. I am not sure if it was zoned R1, 2, or 3, but they sure spent alot of time and untold $$$ leveling it out nice. Can't tell you why it stayed zoned residential, but they sure do have a nice dirt pile. I sure would have liked to see a 4-lane and viaduct to 8th street. Just seems like a good way to make lemonaide from the lemons.
Print This Story Email This Story

Hot Topics

Blogs

Calendar of Events

Photos