Huskers think the run game will bust out

By Brian Christopherson Lee Enterprises
Thursday, Oct 09, 2008 - 02:50:33 am CDT

LINCOLN -- It’s become the question that relieves awkward silences among Nebraska fans across the state: What’s wrong with the Husker running game?

Oh, sure, the run game. Almost everyone has an opinion on the Husker run game. Or at least a question: Where is it?

Take away a 330-yard rushing performance against New Mexico State and Nebraska is averaging 92.8 yards per game on the ground.

So, yes, doubters abound ” here, there and everywhere. Well, not everywhere.

If it’s believers you’re looking for, you’ll still find them at NU practice. There’s a couple of linemen who will tell you the run game is closer to busting out than most realize.

Said senior guard Matt Slauson: “We are on the edge of being a great rushing team. It isn’t any particular guy. It’s just one different guy every different play not necessarily finishing their block. - And what’s weird is they can do it fine on the next play. Just one mental breakdown by one guy kills us every run.”

Said senior tackle Lydon Murtha: “We can run the ball. - It’s certainly not up to what we want for an offensive lineman and we’re going to correct it.”

The words are fine, but it will have to be proven before everyone agrees. Nebraska’s offensive line, hyped as a strength of the team coming into the season, has hardly imposed its will through five games.

In Saturday’s 52-17 loss to Missouri, the Huskers rushed for just 79 yards on 35 carries, an average of 2.3 yards per run. The longest run of the night was 9 yards.

Not surprisingly, Husker offensive line coach Barney Cotton said his guys graded out lower in that game than any other.

“As far as pass protection, we held up well,” Cotton said. “Our issues basically were our inability to block all the movement up front, to where we didn’t get a full on a guy or maybe we mistargeted a guy because of the movement of the defense.”

Movement on San Jose State’s defensive line also caused Husker blockers problems earlier in the year.

Cotton said Missouri had even more movement than San Jose State, but also that “it was nothing we hadn’t practiced against. There may have been only one thing all night that we saw that we had not worked on.”

The Huskers basically used a seven-man rotation. Mike Smith (left tackle), Keith Williams (left guard), Jacob Hickman (center), Slauson (right guard) and Murtha (right tackle) started. Jaivorio Burkes split time at left guard and tackle, and Mike Huff saw time off the bench at left guard, Cotton said.

Slauson and Murtha played every snap and Cotton doesn’t foresee many changes right now.

Nebraska has rushed the ball 165 times and passed it 151 this season. The ratio shouldn’t matter, Slauson said Monday. He thinks this line is capable of being successful at both run and pass blocking.

“It’s all an attitude,” Slauson said. “I’ve always said pass blocking is kind of a dance. You have to step back and mirror a guy and play with your feet a lot. Running is completely the opposite. It’s all hands. You got to dig, dig down into the dirt and grind. You want to be mean and go out there and just take somebody into the turf.”

Slauson said one thing Nebraska needs is to bring a stronger presence on the early downs.

“On first down, a lot of times we’re expecting blitz and when we line up and go, we kind of sit and wait and watch and see what they do,” he said. “And we can’t be having that. Because if you wait until third down to fire off, you’ll be short every time.”

And all those penalties? They have to go. Nebraska had three false starts Saturday.

“I honestly think it’s because guys want to do it so badly, they want to perform so well and they put the carriage in front of the horse,” Slauson said. “They’re coming out with their heart on fire. They just want to go out and win so bad and then they just lose focus. And you can’t do that.”

Cotton said effort isn’t the problem when coaches look at film. It’s just an offense that needs to gain some confidence.

“I think we’re a lot closer than what people think we may be,” he said.

Murtha said Monday’s practice was one of the most physical and focused the team has had all year.

When Husker head coach Bo Pelini told the media after Saturday’s game to put all the blame on him for the loss, Murtha said players took note.

“The coaches say they take the blame for this game, but it’s really us,” Murtha said. “We’re just not executing what we need to and we’re certainly not living up to our potential. We all take it real personal. How fortunate that we have a coach that cares that much that would come out and say that, but it’s something we need to address.

“We’re going to get after it for sure.”

Leave a Comment

All posts are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
   
duh
Oct 9, 2008 9:04 AM
What’s wrong with the Husker running game?

Uh, the players that are running it are not competitive Division 1 athletes. I thought we settled this.
Jack Getz
Oct 9, 2008 9:10 AM
Maybe we need to pick one primary back...one with a really strong drive, and let him carry it for at least a half. I like sharing the load when it represents a change of pace that might confuse the defense, but not evry down.

Also, when the game is close, do what works, not just what the game plan calls for, Tenacity to a plan has its place when it is working, but not when a philosophy costs the game, sacrifices field position or kills momentum.

The option may now be old enough to work again.

Go Big Red!
Class of 1970
speed
Oct 9, 2008 7:45 PM
It's all about speed. The players of today are alot faster and physcial. It is plain and simple. Establish a good passing game and the running game will follow. The days of the option are long gone.
Paul in WI
Oct 10, 2008 12:39 AM
Osborne dominated in his last seasons running the option, and I beg to disagree that kids are faster now than in the middle/late 90's. I have absolutely NO doubt that if Tom Osborne could magically reappear on the sideline and coach once again, his option teams would become every bit as dominant as they were when he retired. We heard all the "option is dead" talk from the talking heads in the late 80's and early 90's, but that sort of talk sure fell silent when the championships started coming. The coach has to be a master of the ground game, and Osborne proved that those don't grow on trees.
I like tatertots
Oct 10, 2008 1:09 PM
I think they need to try running it up the middle or around the ends or in between the middle and the end or along the sideline or around the back or in between two guys not paying any attention. Maybe that's what we need, a diversion. Try faking a pass. They might expect that and block the line instead of covering the receivers and then we could actually complete the pass and run it in for a touchdown. THAT'S IT! WE NEED A PASSING GAME!!!
Option
Oct 10, 2008 2:23 PM
Sure the option was dominate under Osbourne but so were the athletes we had. Frazier, phillips, etc. These athletes go elsewhere now. Defensive coord. have ajusted to the running game and a team has to have both games going to be great. Also look at the size difference between the athletes of the 1980s to now, also you have to admit that athletes are faster and stronger. Please name one team in the top ten or even the top 25 who just run the ball? I hate to say it but the option is dead.
Steve
Oct 10, 2008 8:21 PM
Huskers think the run game will bust out

Yeah...maybe against the Kernels of Popcorn State!

Sorry, but we don't have a "game breaker" running back nor an O-Line that make holes.