Occupancy rate draws Council’s attention

By Adrian Sanchez asanchez@columbustelegram.com
Sunday, Oct 05, 2008 - 12:22:33 am CDT

COLUMBUS -- The City Council is expected to hold a discussion, at the request of the council president, regarding the occupancy rate of single-family homes and the impact new residents are having on zoning issues in Columbus neighborhoods.

The council, meeting as the Committee of the Whole, is scheduled to convene at 6 p.m. Monday in the Council Chambers, 1369 25th Ave., with the regular meeting of the council to follow at 7 p.m.

Council President Jim Bulkley said he requested the item be placed on the agenda to initiate a dialogue on the occupancy rate in terms of what is legal, what would the council and public consider proper, what is the level of importance for this issue and hear any recommendations or proposals to remedy any potential problems.

“This is an item that needs to be bought to discussion because of comments made by other councilmen and citizens,” Bulkley said. “Probably the biggest concerns that I hear are not so much as the occupancy of the house, but the vehicles in front of the house and on the property.”

He said he would like the city to highlight ordinances currently in place that may address overcrowding in single-family residences as well as on streets and property, as well as how often violations of any such ordinance are enforced.

“What ordinances are in place? Are they being enforced? And should they be refined or amended?” he said. “My point is if we don’t discuss them ... people think you are either ignoring it or condoning it.”

Bulkley said he is aware of a home in his area of town where six people reside with eight vehicles either on or around the property, creating congestion.

He said this is an issue of safety, not only for occupants, but also for drivers who must deal with crowded streets.

“I want to find out what is our legal standing,” Bulkley said, and “get facts, not speculation.”

In a memorandum from City Administrator Joseph Mangiamelli, he said the U.S. Supreme Court has recognized a city’s ability to “limit the number of occupants on the basis of available floor space or to control traffic congestion in a neighborhood by prohibiting off street parking.”

However, “these measures cannot be targeted to certain properties or property owners, but must apply and be applied uniformly throughout the community,” Mangiamelli said.

In other news the council is expected to:

n vote on a resolution to approve the agreement between the city and Police Department Fraternal Order of Police, Lodge No. 72, from Oct. 1, 2008, through Sept. 30, 2012. The agreement includes amending health insurance provisions to provide for an increase in single-coverage premium payment at 7 percent over the current 5 percent and an increase in family coverage premium payment at 16 percent over the current 15 percent. It also includes an increased shift differential from 30 cents per hour to 50 cents per hour and established the wages, based on comparable cities to Columbus, at an increase of slightly more than 2 percent.

n consider a report from City Engineer Merlin Lindahl regarding ownership of streets and alleys south of Fourth Street between 21st and 26th avenues as well as a complaint regarding the sidewalk at 2721 Eighth St., both as part of the Public Property, Safety and Works Committee report.

n vote on two resolutions to amend the access agreement between the city and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to provide chemical oxidant injections and to take remedial action as part of the 10th Street Superfund project.

n vote on a resolution to approve a grant application to the Nebraska Department of Environmental Quality regarding the storm water management plan program.

Leave a Comment

All posts are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
   
City Resident
Oct 5, 2008 9:05 AM
I know in certain locations the landlords charge by the number of people living in the residence.
Cropdster
Oct 6, 2008 1:32 AM
My wife & myself, including our three children equal five people in one house.

If we decide to have a few more kids, does that mean i will have to kick a few of them out of the house?
Parking problem
Oct 6, 2008 8:38 AM
If the city is looking at the parking at single-dwelling residences, will they look into what a city or county car is always parked on the street in the evenings and weekends while the owner has a double car garage and driveway. It narrows the street for thru traffic all year long. This is in northwest Columbus and is a mess in the winter time as there's always a pile of snow to avoid.
Realist
Oct 6, 2008 9:58 AM
To Cropdster" Get Real!!! You know exactly what this article is about and who they are focusing on. I would think that you would have a better grip on this article. that is ridiculous that you think like that!!! Man I feel sorry!!
gipsy
Oct 6, 2008 10:14 AM
Reading between the lines it appears that they are trying to target a certain demographic, which I find disgusting.
Single
Oct 6, 2008 10:38 AM
Homes in a single family zone should be kept as "single family." Often times though, a house is rented out by the room resulting in several individuals living in one house. This causes problems like those listed in the article. This isn't a problem based on the ethic background of the renters. This is a problem of the landlord ignoring the zoning laws.
smcrpntr
Oct 6, 2008 12:54 PM
Ok, so the city is concerned about how many people live in a single family residence. First, has the city seen what rentals are going for. I worked as a maintenance person for a local apartment complex and rent keeps going up. For the empty apartments the price is raised several times a year. They justify this as supply and demand. No wonder some people end up in overcrowded residances.
How does the city propose to identify those concidered overcrowded. Will they use the resources available 9Our tax money) to sit and watch? Will they bust in, with or without, a warrent to check it out? Or just how do they expect to decide which are and are not.
They are getting into an area that is just opening themselves up to lawsuits galore. It will make our community look like racists. How is that going look when Columbus tries to lure new business into town?
If they are related then they can be considered a single family. If we are speaking of the Hispanic population and the things that have been said about them , such as," they're all related" then we need to step back and imagine our ancestors when they first came to this country.
What the council needs to do is regulate the rental owners/management, to keep rent reasonable. Also hold these same people accountable for having too many people in one place.
Yes, there are some that are greedy and charge by the head after a cetain level. That is their call, for the moment. Who is going to tell them otherwise.
Our fair city and our city government can apply their energy elsewhere and not be subject to labels and lawsuits.
Good Job
Oct 6, 2008 4:32 PM
I am really impressed with our mayor and city council of late, especially Mr. Bulkley. I would agree with him 100% that this needs to be looked to to see what the ordinances are at present, are they being enforced, and do they need to be refined or amended. I have thought about complaining to the city about a house in our neighborhood. There have got to be 3-4 families living there and there are always 7-8 cars parked everywhere. The traffic is dangerous and I would hate to be living next to them and have to sell my house. Who want to buy a house next door to someone who has 7-8 cars parked in the street in front of their own house and their neighbor's houses, and also in their yard. This should be looked at as some cultures might do this but it is not the norm in America.
Print This Story Email This Story

Hot Topics

Blogs

Calendar of Events

Photos