Woman gets the maximum $1,000 fine for animal cruelty

By Jim Osborn josborn@columbustelegram.com
Thursday, Aug 21, 2008 - 11:29:34 am CDT

COLUMBUS -- A Platte County Court judge said rudeness by a dog owner trying to retrieve her family pet may have triggered a hard-nosed attitude by animal control officers and contributed to a 54-year-old Columbus woman being convicted of animal cruelty.

That was the assessment of Judge Linda Senff from the bench in sentencing Sharlene Sjogren to the maximum fine of $1,000 for the Class I misdemeanor while rejecting a recommendation by Deputy Platte County Attorney Mandy Trout for a two-day jail term.

“One of things that concerns me is your demeanor,’’ Senff told the Columbus woman during a recent sentencing hearing in county court.

The judge said Sjogren was “flippant” with animal control officers when she went to retrieve her pet and that the officers may not have reacted professionally during their initial encounter with the defendant last fall.

The defendant had gone to retrieve the family pet, Puddles, a male bichon fris© dog aged 10 to 13 years old, who had been picked up by animal control after getting loose in September.

Court documents in the case revealed that animal control officers told Sjogren she should get medical treatment for her seriously ill pet or consider putting the animal to sleep.

The postures of the defendant and the animal control officers may have led to all the parties involved becoming too emotionally invested in the case, Senff said.

“I’m convinced the sentence I’m imposing is appropriate,’’ said Senff, adding she was trying to balance the defendant’s lack of a previous criminal record and the fact the dog was a family pet while also taking into account the suffering of the animal.

The sentence came after Sjogren, a licensed practical nurse at Columbus Community Hospital who is studying to become a registered nurse, spoke briefly to the judge.

“I take complete responsibility,’’ Sjogren said. “I loved Puddles, and I am truly sorry.’’

A six-member county court jury didn’t deliberate for long to convict Sjogren, taking less than an hour to convict the city woman of animal cruelty after a one-day trial in June.

A presentence investigation report filed in the case also recommended the sentence include time in the county jail. The judge also spurned Trout’s recommendation that Sjogren’s sentence include one year of probation with the stipulation she not own or possess an animal.

Sjogren continued to show an apparent lack of responsibility for the treatment of the dog even after her conviction by a jury, Trout said, explaining her reasoning in seeking a jail term in the case.

“The jury listened to the evidence and saw the photos, but even after being convicted by a jury of her peers, she did not see that she’d done anything wrong,’’ Trout said.

A Class I misdemeanor is punishable by a maximum of one year imprisonment, $1,000 fine or both and no minimum sentence.

The case revolved around the care of a pet who was becoming more and more feeble late last year. The dog was already seriously ill when he was initially picked up by animal control officers in September

The small, sturdy breed resembles a small poodle, standing about 9 to 12 inches tall and weighing seven to 12 pounds. Bichons have a textured outer coat lined with a soft undercoat, which makes good grooming practices important.

Because bichons are so susceptible to skin problems and allergies, good grooming practices are very important. Bichon fris©s should be professionally groomed at least once every three months.

Puddles, who was blind and had infected skin sores and was pulling out patches of his own coat, escaped out the door of the Sjogren home in late-November.

The dog was picked up for a second time on the afternoon of Nov. 27 and Sjogren was cited by Animal Control Officer Donna Winig for animal neglect and a second offense of animal at-large.

The dog was put to sleep a couple of days later.

Columbus veterinarian Todd Paczosa testified as a prosecution witness at Sjogren’s trial, but declined to comment on his testimony. The vet cited client/doctor privilege as the reason for his silence.

The doctor did say the bichon fris© breed is a long, curly-haired dog that requires regular grooming and bathing.

Animal control gave Sjogren “every opportunity” to care for her dog, Trout said. “They did their job.”

Leave a Comment

All posts are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
   
Will be interested
Aug 21, 2008 2:15 PM
I'll be very interested to see the difference in sentencing between Ms. Sjogren with her dog, and the drive by shooting. Unfortunately in the day and age we live in, I believe that Ms. Sjogren will get the harsher sentence when it's all said and done.
C
Aug 21, 2008 4:13 PM
Dogs should not be subject to an owner that doesn't take the time care for it. The penatly for Ms. Sjogren was justified.
P.S. Isn't this story rather old to be put in the paper? The dog was put to sleep last November.
Happy
Aug 21, 2008 4:54 PM
Great job Animal Control!! Keep up the good the work and find those people who neglect/abuse their animals!
Pet lover too
Aug 21, 2008 8:54 PM
Have any of you ever dealt with pet control in Columbus???
They certainly have a "way" of bringing out the worst in a pet owner.
CO.DogLuver
Aug 21, 2008 9:00 PM
Personally i feel that Ms. Sjogren did not deserve any penalty...as dogs get older their health gets worse,and sadly, it is inevitable that eventually they will die.In this certian case,the dog had skin problems,most likely from not being able to move as well and laying in one spot for a long period of time because of old age.Now, if you had a dog that was that old, and was getting closer to it's time to pass, would you put it through all the stress of going to the vet getting treatment and doing that multiple times?Whatever happened to letting living creatures die peacefully and gracefully in their home with people who love them? Ovbiously Ms. Sjogren loved her dog very much otherwise she wouldn't have made such a big deal when she had troubles getting her dog back.

i guess i better make sure to keep my aging grandparents inside from now on.
ISawItToo
Aug 21, 2008 9:59 PM
For those of you who may not have taken the opportunity to read a good book about a man and his dog; just read "Marley and Me".

When the time comes, and it will come, you have to stop being selfish about the relationship between you and your dog (or other pet) and love the poor suffering animal more than yourself and allow it to die with dignity, pride and fond memories of the good ol' days. Put the dog to sleep and be there with it when you do. Yes, it'll hurt you but it will give you and the dog an opportunity to reflect on all those special moments as you grew together; one last time.

I have been there and those of you who have too know all too well what I am talking about. Would you rather be holding him or her as they take their last breath or do you want to find yourself leaving home to run an errand only to come home and find your faithful friend of 12 or more years died all alone?

Think about it; is it about you or your pet?
Pet Owner
Aug 22, 2008 6:02 AM
Wow CODogLuver I'd hate to be your pet. How do you explain allowing a pet to have "infected sores" and pull out it's own fur instead of seeing a vet. Allowing a pet to "suffer" instead of stopping the suffering IS criminal and she should have received probation with no ability to have pets for awhile at least. Don't you feel secure with our healthcare knowing this woman could be caring for your or your aging family members the same way she care for her "loved" pet. Keep that nurse away from my family please!
Just Wondering
Aug 22, 2008 6:15 AM
I guess we could all speculate about what went on, but if you weren't there is it really fair to do so. I look at the woman was convicted that tells me that that jury found her GUILTY beyond a reasonable doubt. Also the judge gave her the MAXIMUM fine allowed. Tells me something as well. My only question....Why are there no comments in this story from the Officers or their superiors? They should have been able to defend themselves, there are some hard words about them. Looks like at least the County Attorney backed em up or she wouldn't have prosecuted. Scary thing this lady is a nurse.
Power abuse
Aug 22, 2008 12:25 PM
I have dealt with the animal control officers in a "good setting" and they were rude. The people that do this in columbus need to be properly trained and told they are not TRUE police officers. Collect the dogs and the facts and hand it over to the properly trained authorities, in this case the cops. Let them deal with the people if they are rude.
I AGREE
Aug 22, 2008 2:03 PM
I hear you "POWER ABUSE" They have no people skills.......
Momboys
Aug 22, 2008 3:10 PM
I agree with the abuse of power. Are dog got out one summer from our back yard. We were frantic. Yes, we wanted our dog back, but our biggest fear was animal control would get to him first. Then you get dog at large and whatever else they can tack on. Not mentioning being treated as if you robbed a bank and are a career criminal. They are wannabee cops. It's too bad you can't go to them for help without getting the "attitude" and knowing you are going to pay for a one time only incident.
SuzQ
Aug 22, 2008 3:10 PM
My black lab has taken off on me several times but there was one time the police were called and by the time I got there they were getting ready to take him to dog jail. Anyway my dog heard me driving down the street (old dodge pick-up) toward him and he started running toward me and dragged the police officer right along with him. I feel the officer gave me a ticket for dog at large because he was angry and embarrassed that my dog got the best of him.

About the dog being put to sleep. I can see if she was taking him to the vet to take care of his medical issues, but to me this is neglect to let the dog outside unattended if the poor thing can't see. This woman is a nurse and I would be a little leary if she was taking care of me.
heather
Aug 22, 2008 10:01 PM
I happen to know this EXTREMELY WONDERFUL AND GIVING woman, and this situation was allowed to get completely out of hand!! It was absolutely ridiculous what happened in this case, and it scares me to think of what might happen if our cat ever got out of the house. As anyone who has ever had a pet knows, the hardest decision is when the right time to allow your pet to die should be. Puddles was blind and mostly deaf (I believe) and accidentally got out of the house. When he trotted away, he accidentally scratched himself numerous times on a neighboring fence. It was a terrible accident, as anyone knows who has ever have a pet "escape"- even for a few minutes- especially when she happened to not be home. This woman would not hurt a fly, let alone a living creature, and I am truly appalled that this is her "sentence", my gosh you can drive drunk and darn near KILL SOMEONE and pay less!! If they were trying to set an example, the LEAST they could have done was to have someone who cages up, beats, never feeds, and completely mistreats their animal(s) be given this type of fine (and then rightly so), NOT SOMEONE WHO LOVED THEIR PET SO MUCH THEY HAD A HARD TIME TRYING TO SAY "GOODBYE"!!
MLR
Aug 23, 2008 1:13 AM
My response to pet lover too...Have you ever considered that having to deal with the things that animal control has to endure might help make you a little less than pleasant? When you are the one who has to help euthanize and than cremate the bodies of pets that were not properly cared for or abused, maybe you will have a little more sympathy for those do it on a daily basis. Animal control is a thankless job. I no longer live in Columbus, but am a native, born and raised. I do agree that some of the staff that were there when I was still in town are seriously lacking people skills. but try to remember...these people deal with unthinking careless people everyday. The most notable case in point is the woman described in the article...letting an animal suffer out of sheer callousness or ignorance is unforgivable. Thats my two cents, and in the words of Bob Barker...SPAY AND NEUTER YOUR PETS!!!
Get Real
Aug 23, 2008 6:11 AM
Of course your "really good friend" would tell you the dog was "accidentally scratched up". Maybe you should have sat through the trial and looked at the pictures, listened to the witnesses and saw the "truth". Accidental scratches that have "just occured" don't get INFECTED immediately and they don't cause a dog to "pull out patches of his fur" because he is so uncomfortable. You've been "had" lady. And if your cat gets out. Hopefully you call "immediately" looking for it and you have it vaccinated and licensed and wearing it's identification. Oh yeah, make sure it doesn't "repeatedly" keep getting out the same way as well.
Truth
Aug 23, 2008 7:01 AM
Heather- A veterinary testified in this case that the animal was neglected. If it were a case the dog had scratches from a fence, that would have been determined. I know people in this town have been railroaded by animal control & the newspaper before, however I have faith that a court of law would not have handed down this serious of a penalty had there not been neglect. I follow animal neglect cases in Platte County & there have been several seriously starved dog cases & people have walked away with $100 fines. It is possible your friend is a good person towards people, but I hope she increases her education, knowledge, awareness, and caring for animals before she owns another one.
matt
Aug 23, 2008 9:48 AM
i know shar, and i know the last thing she thought she was doing was being cruel to her animal. She is the sweetest most caring person in the entire world and this is a complete joke, i just wish someone would have asked me to testify, this is the worst thing ive ever heard of. A JOKE OF A CASE, shar and the entire family loved puddles and maybe a little too much
j
Aug 24, 2008 3:42 PM
I don't think people get the real problem here. Yes she was convicted and yes she will have to pay her fine, but we as taxpayers pay the salaries of the animal control officers, and the prosecuters. My problem is why are we as tax payers paying animal control officers a salary when in the judges own words say that our officers failed to act in a professional manner, if that doesn't tell us that they need training or new officers what does. And as a prosectuer why would you not plea this case down, instead of costing taxpayers money. Maybe they took it a little personal.
Print This Story Email This Story

Hot Topics

Blogs

Calendar of Events

Photos