Board to hear 246 protests

By Eric Freeman efreeman@columbustelegram.com
Wednesday, Jul 02, 2008 - 11:21:13 am CDT

COLUMBUS -- A total of 246 property valuation protests had been received by the Platte County Clerk’s office by the end business Tuesday.

Residents protesting their 2008 property valuation will begin receiving notices containing the date and time of their hearing before the Platte County Board of Equalization in the next few days.

The Platte County Supervisors have set the dates for protest hearings to begin at 1 p.m. July 15 and end at 4:30 p.m. July 22.

On July 16-18 and July 21, the protest hearings will begin at 9 a.m. and will continue as long as needed. The last day of hearings, July 22, will begin at 9 a.m. and end at 4:30 p.m. or as as soon as all the hearings have been held.

“This number of protests is about average for years when we make significant changes like we have this year,” said Platte County Assessor Vanora Mulligan. “Last year, we had 77 valuation protests, which is the average low number we might see.”

Mulligan has served in the assessor’s office since 1976 and was elected Platte County Assessor in 1999.

The total number of protests filed in 2006 was 179, and 161 were filed in 2005.

Mulligan said a complete review of the county began in 2002 and was completed in 2006. She said a review typically takes about four years and includes a review of a portion of Columbus, a few subdivisions, four or five townships and a couple of the smaller towns or villages in the county.

“The number of protests was down last year, probably because we were doing pick-up work and there were very few changes,” Mulligan said. “This year we’ve begun a new review which comes with more changes usually. From this time on the legislature is requiring a review every six years.

Mulligan said there were a total of 17,739 parcels in Platte County in 2008. She said that number is fluid from year to year because properties can be joined or divided as properties change hands.

The supervisors meeting took on the atmosphere of a courtroom when issues regarding isolated property, owned by Max Jenny, were debated by Jenny’s attorneys and the adjacent property owners.

Interim Platte County Attorney Carl Hart reviewed the issue from its beginning. He reminded the supervisors of the statute that was the basis for action they took in declaring an old trail road to a newly designated access road.

Hart reviewed the original appraisal and additional cost to cure items related to fencing and trees of the adjacent properties, which was done by Certified General Appraiser John Wurdeman.

Following Hart’s review, attorneys Ray Baker, representing the Jenny family, and Gene Schumacher, representing the Lawrence Stec family, addressed the board with their arguments for various adjustments to the appraisal.

Schumacher’s argument was the supervisors had no authority to include an order for the Jennys to build the access road in its resolution and Wurdeman’s original appraisal was the correct appraisal to use.

Schumacher’s argument won the day. The board voted to table the matter until the July 15 meeting and directed Hart to review the original resolution.

The property owners contending the issue were encouraged to meet and resolve the issue and return to the board with a written agreement on the value of damages or to be prepared to abide by the board’s final decision.

In other action, the board approved a change order for work being done to the courthouse steps and sidewalks in the amount of $24,153. The change raises the total amount of the project from $39,318.44 to a total of $63,471.44.

Leave a Comment

All posts are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
   
paulcan
Jul 2, 2008 1:33 PM
Everyone's complaining how much their valuations went up. But think about it folks...how long had it been since it was last raised? Personally, my valuation hadn't been raised since 2002. So in 2008 it gets raised 21%. Did it increase 21% in just one year? Certainly not. The increase is 3.2% on an annualized basis over six years. Thats how to look at it. The county is just playing "catch-up" thats all.
Desa Happ
Jul 2, 2008 3:34 PM
To paulcan, that's fine to look at it that way but when ours went up sky high we had an appraiser come out and our valuation is well above what the appraisal came in at. So really we will be paying taxes on more than our propety could sell for. IS THAT FAIR!
Shell Creek Land Owner
Jul 2, 2008 7:59 PM
I own ground along the shell creek flood plain and it floods every year because people up the creek straighten the creek so water comes down faster into our parts and causes worse flooding. Why should I have to pay more in taxes when it keeps flooding. If anything, people up the creek should pay more in taxes since they are straightening the crick illegally, and those who get flooded out year after year should be reduced. Paulcan, if you would like to buy my ground at the current land value price of high 4k an acre, please let me know and i'll sell it to you first thing tomorrow morning. You can even harvest the crops that are on it....o wait, there are none!
John K
Jul 3, 2008 1:27 AM
Quit whining about property taxes!

Remember the democrats don't believe in private property ownership.

Bow to Obama! Pay those taxes!
what about bob
Jul 3, 2008 11:02 AM
My taxes have gone up 4 times in the last 6 years. The increase is just under 37%. Your post only confirms my biggest complaint that property taxes are not equitable and completely arbitrary. It's time to recall our assessor and get someone in office that can figure out how to raise taxes, if they must, across the board rather than make some people pay much more than others. I'm tired of the excuses from the office about manpower and their "4 year cycle". Read the laws concerning how property taxes are to be levied and you will see how incompetent our current assessor is.
paulcan
Jul 3, 2008 3:18 PM
To Happ and ShellCreek: My point is simply that in my case, like many, a 3.2 annualized increase in Columbus home valuations is not "out of line", with the Columbus housing market. To Happ: STOP SHOUTING! If you have an appraisal for less than the valuation, by all means fight it, because it you've done your homework and have a good chance of winning an appeal. Good luck! To Shell Creek: If your land floods out year after year, why farm it? Maybe you should sign up for the wetlands version of the CRP instead. But if it floods out every five years, I'll take your offer and collect CRC insurance. How many acres? You may have a buyer. At $4K an acre, I assume its irrigated.
Dont blame democrats
Jul 3, 2008 5:34 PM
John K get a clue.....Obama hasn't been elected yet so quit blaming the democrats!!!!!!!
miffed at assessor
Jul 4, 2008 2:24 PM
paulcan,
Maybe that works out with your home... but certainly not ours!! The first year we payed taxes on our home was the full calendar year of 2006. The latest valuation is for 2007- OUR HOUSE INCREASED 19% in one year! That is crazy.. and it affected our whole neighborhood. 19% may not seem high- but it adds up to a whopping $75,000 increase!!! I do not believe for one minute I could get from my home what it is currently valued at. It certainly does NOT work out to a 3% increase per year...
Crats R the Problem
Jul 4, 2008 11:46 PM
Actually, since the democrats have control of congress it's interesting to see how they're raising property and every other tax.
Print This Story Email This Story

Hot Topics

Blogs

Calendar of Events

Photos