Delinquent support pay earns man prison time

By Jim Osborn josborn@columbustelegram.com
Friday, Jul 04, 2008 - 12:18:31 am CDT

COLUMBUS -- A 44-year-old Columbus man who “pathetically failed” in his last chance to catch up on a stack of unpaid child support bills was sentenced to 18 months to four years in prison in Platte County District Court.

District Judge Robert Steinke told Richard Delancey Wednesday he had “pathetically failed to comply with the terms of his probation” while sentencing the defendant to prison for his summer 2007 convictions on four counts of criminal nonsupport.

Steinke on Wednesday revoked the four-year probation sentence he imposed last summer against Delancey in what the judge at the time promised would be the defendant’s last chance to avoid a prison cell.

“While you don’t take the terms of your probation seriously, I do,’’ Steinke told Delancey, standing before him in front of the bench. “I gave you the opportunity to change your life ... it simply has not worked. The court is without any option. You have to be held accountable.”

Criminal nonsupport is a Class IV felony, punishable by a maximum of five years imprisonment, $10,000 fine or both and no minimum sentence.

Steinke said Delancey had been negligent in following the terms of his probation since last summer, missing support payments, skipping drug-testing appointments and having more brushes with law enforcement authorities.

The defendant, who began working for a Columbus company last fall, failed to make a support payment until April, was a “no show” for urinalysis tests and was arrested for driving under the influence and driving under suspension a couple of times.

Steinke was dubious of Delancey’s recent payment history during Wednesday’s sentencing hearing.

“You have no problem finding the financial resources to buy drugs,’’ the judge told the defendant. “The sad fact is you’re working today (and making payments) because you think it might save your hide from imprisonment. Your problems require a structured correctional setting.”

Delancey pleaded guilty last July to four counts of criminal nonsupport of three children in violation of a 1999 child support order.

In return for his guilty pleas, the Platte County Attorney's Office dismissed eight other counts of criminal nonsupport. Delancey, according to the district court clerk’s office records last summer, had not made his $669 monthly payment since April 2006.

The district court office’s records indicated the defendant was behind by $25,918 on his support payments through December 2006. He has fallen further behind on his payments during the last 18 months.

At Wednesday’s hearing, Public Defender Sam Bethune said the defendant has been trapped in a cycle of growing debt and stints behind bars on contempt charges for nonpayment since falling behind in his support payments.

He described a situation in which Delancey gets a job, but before he can put enough money together to resume his support payments, a court cites him for civil contempt and issues a warrant for his arrest.

“It’s a vicious cycle ... something we should try to avoid,’’ said Bethune in arguing for keeping his client on probation.

Leave a Comment

All posts are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
   
phreakwars
Jul 4, 2008 3:07 AM
OH BOY, NOW INSTEAD OF HIM PAYING CHILD SUPPORT, US TAXPAYERS GET TO PAY FOR HIS ROOM AND BOARD. How about better programs instead of prison for non payment of child support, like mandatory MANUAL LABOR/ Public service work. And it IS a vicious cycle. Child support can and does put people in the poor house, yet, who the hell wants their tax dollars going to support someone else's kid with welfare? It's bad enough we have to support illegal citizens and free loaders. But still, prison is not the answer to deadbeats who won't cough up a couple bucks for the jolly's they got one fateful night.
WTH
Jul 4, 2008 10:23 AM
I understand how important child support is, but this man gets a way BIGGER sentence then most drug busts that run through Platte County! How does this work?!!? I understand he is a repeat law breaker, but come on!! Put him in jail, with no job, on taxpayer money and let those who aide meth deliveries etc., free on probation. I have little faith in the judicial system.....
whatever
Jul 4, 2008 12:21 PM
Just another one that can get money for drugs and booze but not support their children. Amen pheakwars....we are now paying for his housing and his child(ren) and without child support. Make his work in prison and garnish his wages. Something different than letting him sleep all day.
SouthSideRes
Jul 4, 2008 3:52 PM
You couldn't have said it any better phreak.

I've known other guys who go through the same crap every 90 days. Get a job & work just over a month & then get thrown in jail because of not paying any or enough child support. Because of that the job is usually gone when they get out & the whole thing starts all over again.

Twenty five bucks can get ya drunk and\or high. Ya get caught driving & things go even more downhill in a hurry.

Then ya got the self-rightous perfect people getting on ya because of the drinking and\or drugging the guy does.

At the same time mom is busy partying & any money she did or does get goes to her bad habits & not the kids. She's got welfare for the kids so any cash she sees goes to her "needs".

I know, not all people are like this, but there are enough that something needs to be changed somewhere along the line. The guy getting prison time while mom partys just isn't right.
Dadyoudaman
Jul 4, 2008 5:47 PM
If he wants to "spawn little ones," ignore their support needs and be so self absorbed to spend his money on drugs and alcohol... then throw his sorry *## in prison !!! "Deadbeat dads" are the reason we have half the trouble we have in society! I'll gladly pay taxes to house this jerk!!!
perry
Jul 4, 2008 6:55 PM
Well I agree with most people said on here. taxed payer are getting stuck and she most likely have fun on us. But then some that dont. But if he would have put all money toward his kids and would have show the court where all his money was going at I bet he wouldnt got thrown in again. I sure the judge wouldnt put him in if he could show that all his money was accounted for.
Now what we need is place to put guys like him in a work release where he gets to work but has to bring back his check till he caught up. Then once he caught up he gets out. That just my 2 cent worth.
phreakwars
Jul 4, 2008 8:38 PM
To Dadyoudaman: Do you also realize, not only are you now paying for his stay in prison, you are probably ALSO paying for his kids survival. You get a double shot burden from that. I say what needs to happen is the person who is granted custody, must be REQUIRED to provide for their kids, and the person paying support should be allowed to claim them on his taxes. I know of one particular case where SHE cheated on HIM, they divorced, she got the kids, and now HE is forced to scrape by living in a tiny apartment working a full time and a part time job. Yeah, some reward for showing his devotion to the marriage and having her cheat on him. Why SHOULD he pay? She should take 100% full economic responsibility if she wanted the kids so damn bad. Hey, she cheated on him, let him have his freedom back instead of making him live a paupers life until the kids are of age.. it's not fair. I can't honestly call all people dead beats... true there are some dead beats, but alot of them get that status because of the way they are forced into near poverty, all the while, the former significant other gets to live the high life. I'm not saying people shouldn't have to pay child support, I'm just saying a better system needs to be in place that doesn't let the burden fall on the tax payers, and that system should be the requirement of the former significant other to take 100% of the burden themselves when those checks ain't showing up in the mail.
dadyoudaman
Jul 5, 2008 6:14 AM
If this guy's kids go on welfare, then that is just one more reason to cage him! To suggest that a mom should assume 100% of the support obligations when a guy like this drops the ball is just goofy. Such a black and white rule would not account for the variety of circumstances mothers find themselves in, and would certainly result in many kids living in abject poverty and eventually tearing the town apart for a loaf of bread.
StepMomster
Jul 5, 2008 8:57 AM
First, it should not be the tax payers problem!
Second, the courts need to stop cutting the noses of fathers to spite the children! Because in the end, putting him in jail solves nothing and only deprives yet another child of having two parents.
Lastly, if the courts and agencies could shift their concern from the money, to the children, where it should be, then we would ALL be better off!
the game
Jul 5, 2008 9:30 AM
I KNOW WAY TO MANY PEOPLE IN THIS SAME SITUATION. DADS PAYING 1200 A MONTH FOR TWO KIDS. DADS PAYING 600 FOR ONE ITS NOT RIGHT. WHEN THE CUSTOIDAL PARENT RUNS OUT OF MONEY TAKE THE NON BACK FOR MORE. HOW IS THE NON SUPPOSE TO MAKE A LIVING. THEY TRY TO GET BETTER PAYING JOBS OH WAIT CHILD SUPPORT GOES UP AGAIN. THIS SYSTEM HAS GOT TO GET CHANGED. THERE IS KNOW WAY THE NON CAN EVER GET AHEAD EVEN IF THEY GOT ANOTHER FAMILY TO CARE FOR AND SUPPORT. WHERE IS THE GOVERMENT HELP FOR NON PARENT WAIT THERE IS NONE
YOU ARE NOW BEHIND ON YOU CHILDSUPPORT.
divorced
Jul 5, 2008 10:24 AM
It doesnt matter if the pay 600 a month or 188 a month for 3 kids. The judges in this town and some lawyers need to step up and do something more with these dads and mothers that need to pay.I went thru this for 3 years before my ex started to wise up and pay. I only have 1 left to pay for and the pay never changed. but for a long time i was in the court room every month and these guys just got ( well we need to work harder) and let go until the next month. Then they would HiFIve each other on the way out of the court house. It made me sick. But my kids all turned out with college educations because i worked several jobs to make up for what there dad didnt. Dont ever count on The Platte county court to give you a fair deal because it wont happen. They need a new Judge..
Lary Holland
Jul 5, 2008 12:17 PM
The Child Support Enforcement program nationwide has been and continues to be a miserable failure. There is no gain for the taxpayers at all.

Michigan forgot to distribute 56 Million dollars after they collected it from parents, and then didn't even send it back to the payer. They get to keep it if they can hold it for a year as undistributed collections.

WORSE is that of the 1.39 BILLION dollars collected only 36 Million went to actual needy families.

The program is a disgrace and just encourages more family feuds and breakdowns instead of a healthy society.

Do a search for Title IV-D Embezzlement and Title IV-D theft and you will see just how ridiculous the program is. There is very little oversight and it is a growing bureaucracy of over 60,000 employees nationwide. That is way more than double the drug enforcement workers our nation has!!!

Lary Holland
http://www.nationwideblueprint.com
A joke
Jul 5, 2008 2:31 PM
I have no problem with people paying child support, just as long as it goes towards the child. I have known many people who misuse child support, buying new cars, clothes, etc., just for themselves and the kids still have nothing. Something has to be set up somehow to make sure the money goes to the kids. The system has turned into an abused one.
disagree
Jul 5, 2008 4:58 PM
To phreakwars,

I usually agree with what you have to say in your posts. Today I am thinking you must be smoking crack. (although I still agree with your first post on this issue) Regarding your friend, I don't care WHO cheated on WHO, those kids belong to BOTH parents. To say she should be supporting them 100% because she decided to leave the marriage is the dumbest thing I ever heard. It's the kids that suffer the most in these situations. I'm sure they didn't ask for mom to stray from the marriage. You should know it takes TWO parents to raise children. you are WAY off on the mark here - sorry for your friend, but to say he shouldn't have to pay for his own children because his wife cheated is the dumbest, most immature response I've ever heard. So these children should go without proper medical care, enough food and clothing, etc. because of what the mother did??? I hope to GOD you aren't a parent...
a mom
Jul 5, 2008 5:05 PM
I say GOOD JOB Platte County. My ex, who cheated on me, owes me over $47,000. I haven't been able to collect a dime because he is self employed and lives out of state. If other states would take Nebraska's lead, there would be a lot more moms like me - the hard working kind that support their children on there own, and pray everyday that just once there will be a support check in the mail. Columbus is full of deadbeat losers. I can honestly say it's worse places I've ever lived. I hope I can get my children out soon - in case it's contagious.
MG
Jul 5, 2008 9:47 PM
ok, I think that yes this man should have to pay child support, but my husband of 15 years, is owed back child support, from when I first met him. His ex wife gets 48% of his military retirement, and she will not get a job, because she thinks that $10.00 a month is good enough. I personally think that dead beat mothers should be in the SAME boat. But Nebraska would rather tax payers to pay her bill, because they will not even think about taking the money that my husband makes away from her. How is that fair, that he worked for 20 years and the state will give his ex money, but will not make her pay him what she owes. We have raised his daughter on what we make and she sends back a whole $10.00 a month AFTER the kids were old enough to be on there own
wtb
Jul 5, 2008 9:53 PM
(a mom -Columbus is full of deadbeat losers.)

No they just make it in the paper.

(I can honestly say it's worse place I've ever lived.)

I hear this a lot so I guess I want to know where you lived before or after columbus, and why its so much better.
phreakwars
Jul 5, 2008 9:58 PM
To disagree: I guess what I am saying here, is why should he be forced to support HER lifestyle. Sure, she works too, but she's getting "X" amount more each month. That ain't going to the kids, this I am 100% sure of. And that's my big complaint. It's one thing to support your children's well being, it's another thing to be paying for your EX's new life.
rob g
Jul 6, 2008 10:16 AM
Judges need to realize that there is not enough money to go around. I am sure this judge has never worked a day in his life. He does not realize how hard it is to try to surive making a working mans wage. I am not sticking up for this guy but only making a point that needs to be made. On average women are far more likely to have financial stability after a divorce than the man is. Most women do collect a large child support check, and many have a full income from there new spouse as well. A working wage man has very little chance of ever having a normal family life again!
Big Bob
Jul 6, 2008 10:42 AM
I agree with "A Joke". However, I also believe a person is responsible for their own actions. One must realize that what ever is plugged may get you legally mugged. Another realization would be to never enter into a marriage with anyone that may become a questonable spouse. ie. don't think marriage or a child will change anyone. They are now and will continue to be into the future the person they are now. In addition to, a marriage will not fix any finacial problems. Don't get married unless you can affoard to. You make your own bed to lay in now live with it.
Michael Saxton
Jul 6, 2008 12:13 PM
Most fathers are loving, caring parents who only want to remain equally and actively involved in their childrens lives after divorce or seperation. Family Court has a financial incentive to limit one parents (usually the father) time with their children. For every dollar spent in child support collection the state receives two from the federal government as an incentive and bonus. Pretty good deal, huh?

If you want to do something to help families and children join us in Washington DC this August for DCFESTIVAL2008.

http://www.dcfestival2008.com
Mo
Jul 9, 2008 4:05 PM
Yes I read this article. I want to know how a person (man or woman) gets behind on Child-Support of $25,918.00. This did not happen over 2 years, add it up figure it out. Yes the system does need some changes.
Oh wow hearing only one side of the story in the paper makes all of you experts on hear-say.
Story Photo
Richard Delancey
Print This Story Email This Story

Hot Topics

Blogs

Calendar of Events

Photos